Grafana Stack
Alternative to Datadog
Best for
Open-source observability and self-hosting teams
Cost
Core components are open source and free to self-host; managed cloud offerings and enterprise features are available via subscription.
Summary
Open-source observability stack centered on Grafana for visualization, commonly paired with Prometheus, Loki, Tempo, and Mimir for metrics, logs, traces, and alerting.
Why Switch
Teams switch from Datadog to Grafana Stack when they prefer a more flexible, self-managed observability approach and want to reduce reliance on a fully managed proprietary platform.
Migration Playbook
- Export metrics data from Datadog using the Datadog API in JSON format, focusing on key metrics such as CPU usage, memory, and application-specific metrics. Map Datadog metric names and tags to Prometheus-compatible metric names and labels. Import the transformed metrics into Prometheus using the Prometheus remote write API or by converting JSON to Prometheus exposition format and scraping via Prometheus exporters.
- Export logs from Datadog in JSON format via the Datadog Logs API, ensuring to include timestamp, log level, message, and any relevant tags or attributes. Map Datadog log fields to Loki's log entry format, including labels for filtering and querying. Push the logs into Loki using the Loki HTTP API or by configuring Promtail to ingest the exported logs after transformation.
- Export tracing data from Datadog in OpenTelemetry or Jaeger format using Datadog's tracing API or export tools. Map Datadog trace attributes and spans to the OpenTelemetry or Jaeger data model compatible with Tempo. Import the tracing data into Tempo by sending the traces via Tempo's ingestion API or by using the OpenTelemetry Collector configured to receive Datadog traces and forward them to Tempo.
Pros
- 🟢Flexible and widely adopted open-source ecosystem
- 🟢Excellent dashboards and visualization
- 🟢Vendor-neutral and highly extensible
- 🟢Strong community support
Cons
- 🔴Requires assembling and operating multiple components
- 🔴Less turnkey than commercial suites
- 🔴Advanced enterprise features may require paid offerings
0 builders switched
Grafana Stack
Alternative to Datadog
Best for
Open-source observability and self-hosting teams
Cost
Core components are open source and free to self-host; managed cloud offerings and enterprise features are available via subscription.
Summary
Open-source observability stack centered on Grafana for visualization, commonly paired with Prometheus, Loki, Tempo, and Mimir for metrics, logs, traces, and alerting.
Why Switch
Teams switch from Datadog to Grafana Stack when they prefer a more flexible, self-managed observability approach and want to reduce reliance on a fully managed proprietary platform.
Migration Playbook
- Export metrics data from Datadog using the Datadog API in JSON format, focusing on key metrics such as CPU usage, memory, and application-specific metrics. Map Datadog metric names and tags to Prometheus-compatible metric names and labels. Import the transformed metrics into Prometheus using the Prometheus remote write API or by converting JSON to Prometheus exposition format and scraping via Prometheus exporters.
- Export logs from Datadog in JSON format via the Datadog Logs API, ensuring to include timestamp, log level, message, and any relevant tags or attributes. Map Datadog log fields to Loki's log entry format, including labels for filtering and querying. Push the logs into Loki using the Loki HTTP API or by configuring Promtail to ingest the exported logs after transformation.
- Export tracing data from Datadog in OpenTelemetry or Jaeger format using Datadog's tracing API or export tools. Map Datadog trace attributes and spans to the OpenTelemetry or Jaeger data model compatible with Tempo. Import the tracing data into Tempo by sending the traces via Tempo's ingestion API or by using the OpenTelemetry Collector configured to receive Datadog traces and forward them to Tempo.
Pros
- 🟢Flexible and widely adopted open-source ecosystem
- 🟢Excellent dashboards and visualization
- 🟢Vendor-neutral and highly extensible
- 🟢Strong community support
Cons
- 🔴Requires assembling and operating multiple components
- 🔴Less turnkey than commercial suites
- 🔴Advanced enterprise features may require paid offerings
0 builders switched