Ashby
Alternative to Greenhouse
Best for
High-growth teams that prioritize recruiting analytics, automation, and a modern all-in-one hiring workflow.
Cost
Subscription pricing is quote-based and generally aimed at scaling startups and mid-market companies; implementation and add-ons may apply.
Summary
Ashby is an all-in-one recruiting platform combining ATS, scheduling, analytics, and sourcing tools for data-driven hiring teams.
Why Switch
Teams switch from Greenhouse to Ashby when they want stronger recruiting analytics and a more modern all-in-one hiring experience.
Migration Playbook
- Export candidate data from Greenhouse using the CSV export feature, ensuring to include fields such as candidate name, contact information, resume links, interview feedback, and application status. Map these fields to Ashby's candidate import template, aligning Greenhouse's 'Application Status' to Ashby's 'Candidate Stage' and 'Interview Feedback' to Ashby's 'Notes' section.
- Extract job requisition details from Greenhouse by exporting job postings in CSV or JSON format, including job titles, descriptions, hiring managers, and requisition statuses. Import this data into Ashby via their job import API, mapping Greenhouse's 'Hiring Manager' field to Ashby's 'Owner' field and 'Requisition Status' to Ashby's 'Job Status' to maintain workflow continuity.
- Transfer interview schedules and feedback by exporting interview data from Greenhouse in CSV format, capturing interview dates, interviewer assignments, and candidate evaluations. Use Ashby's scheduling API to import this data, mapping Greenhouse's 'Interviewer' to Ashby's 'Interviewer' field and 'Candidate Evaluation' to Ashby's 'Interview Feedback' to preserve interview insights and scheduling accuracy.
Pros
- 🟢Excellent analytics and reporting
- 🟢Modern user experience
- 🟢Combines ATS, scheduling, and sourcing workflows
- 🟢Popular with high-growth teams
Cons
- 🔴May be more than small teams need
- 🔴Pricing is not transparent
- 🔴Some enterprise governance needs may require evaluation
0 builders switched
Ashby
Alternative to Greenhouse
Best for
High-growth teams that prioritize recruiting analytics, automation, and a modern all-in-one hiring workflow.
Cost
Subscription pricing is quote-based and generally aimed at scaling startups and mid-market companies; implementation and add-ons may apply.
Summary
Ashby is an all-in-one recruiting platform combining ATS, scheduling, analytics, and sourcing tools for data-driven hiring teams.
Why Switch
Teams switch from Greenhouse to Ashby when they want stronger recruiting analytics and a more modern all-in-one hiring experience.
Migration Playbook
- Export candidate data from Greenhouse using the CSV export feature, ensuring to include fields such as candidate name, contact information, resume links, interview feedback, and application status. Map these fields to Ashby's candidate import template, aligning Greenhouse's 'Application Status' to Ashby's 'Candidate Stage' and 'Interview Feedback' to Ashby's 'Notes' section.
- Extract job requisition details from Greenhouse by exporting job postings in CSV or JSON format, including job titles, descriptions, hiring managers, and requisition statuses. Import this data into Ashby via their job import API, mapping Greenhouse's 'Hiring Manager' field to Ashby's 'Owner' field and 'Requisition Status' to Ashby's 'Job Status' to maintain workflow continuity.
- Transfer interview schedules and feedback by exporting interview data from Greenhouse in CSV format, capturing interview dates, interviewer assignments, and candidate evaluations. Use Ashby's scheduling API to import this data, mapping Greenhouse's 'Interviewer' to Ashby's 'Interviewer' field and 'Candidate Evaluation' to Ashby's 'Interview Feedback' to preserve interview insights and scheduling accuracy.
Pros
- 🟢Excellent analytics and reporting
- 🟢Modern user experience
- 🟢Combines ATS, scheduling, and sourcing workflows
- 🟢Popular with high-growth teams
Cons
- 🔴May be more than small teams need
- 🔴Pricing is not transparent
- 🔴Some enterprise governance needs may require evaluation
0 builders switched