AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Alternative to Heroku
Best for
AWS-centric teams and teams with existing cloud ops maturity
Cost
No separate platform fee; you pay for the underlying AWS resources used (EC2, load balancers, RDS, etc.). Can be cost-effective at small scale but requires cloud cost management.
Summary
Managed application deployment service on AWS for web apps and APIs, with support for multiple languages, autoscaling, load balancing, and integration with the broader AWS ecosystem.
Why Switch
Teams switch from Heroku to AWS Elastic Beanstalk when they want tighter AWS integration, more control over infrastructure choices, and a service that fits broader AWS governance and cost management practices.
Migration Playbook
- Export your Heroku application code and dependencies by cloning the Git repository and generating a requirements file (e.g., requirements.txt for Python or package.json for Node.js). Also, export environment variables using the Heroku CLI command 'heroku config' to capture configuration settings.
- Map Heroku environment variables to AWS Elastic Beanstalk environment properties. Prepare an Elastic Beanstalk configuration file (.ebextensions) or use the AWS Management Console to set environment variables accordingly. Ensure that build and runtime dependencies specified in your manifest files are compatible with Elastic Beanstalk supported platforms.
- Deploy the application to AWS Elastic Beanstalk by creating a new application environment via the AWS Management Console or AWS CLI. Upload your application source bundle (ZIP file containing your code and configuration files) to Elastic Beanstalk using the 'aws elasticbeanstalk create-application-version' and 'aws elasticbeanstalk update-environment' APIs. Verify deployment and configure autoscaling and load balancing settings as needed.
Pros
- π’Deep AWS integration
- π’Supports many runtimes and deployment patterns
- π’Autoscaling and managed infrastructure reduce ops overhead
Cons
- π΄Less opinionated and more configuration-heavy than Heroku
- π΄Costs can become complex across multiple AWS services
- π΄Requires stronger cloud/IaC knowledge
0 builders switched
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Alternative to Heroku
Best for
AWS-centric teams and teams with existing cloud ops maturity
Cost
No separate platform fee; you pay for the underlying AWS resources used (EC2, load balancers, RDS, etc.). Can be cost-effective at small scale but requires cloud cost management.
Summary
Managed application deployment service on AWS for web apps and APIs, with support for multiple languages, autoscaling, load balancing, and integration with the broader AWS ecosystem.
Why Switch
Teams switch from Heroku to AWS Elastic Beanstalk when they want tighter AWS integration, more control over infrastructure choices, and a service that fits broader AWS governance and cost management practices.
Migration Playbook
- Export your Heroku application code and dependencies by cloning the Git repository and generating a requirements file (e.g., requirements.txt for Python or package.json for Node.js). Also, export environment variables using the Heroku CLI command 'heroku config' to capture configuration settings.
- Map Heroku environment variables to AWS Elastic Beanstalk environment properties. Prepare an Elastic Beanstalk configuration file (.ebextensions) or use the AWS Management Console to set environment variables accordingly. Ensure that build and runtime dependencies specified in your manifest files are compatible with Elastic Beanstalk supported platforms.
- Deploy the application to AWS Elastic Beanstalk by creating a new application environment via the AWS Management Console or AWS CLI. Upload your application source bundle (ZIP file containing your code and configuration files) to Elastic Beanstalk using the 'aws elasticbeanstalk create-application-version' and 'aws elasticbeanstalk update-environment' APIs. Verify deployment and configure autoscaling and load balancing settings as needed.
Pros
- π’Deep AWS integration
- π’Supports many runtimes and deployment patterns
- π’Autoscaling and managed infrastructure reduce ops overhead
Cons
- π΄Less opinionated and more configuration-heavy than Heroku
- π΄Costs can become complex across multiple AWS services
- π΄Requires stronger cloud/IaC knowledge
0 builders switched