Datadog Error Tracking
Alternative to Sentry
Best for
Enterprise observability teams
Cost
Subscription pricing based on hosts, APM usage, logs, and add-ons; error tracking is typically bundled within a larger observability contract.
Summary
Commercial observability platform with application error tracking, tracing, logs, and infrastructure monitoring for teams that want a broader APM and observability suite around exception monitoring.
Why Switch
Teams switch from Sentry to Datadog Error Tracking when they want Sentry-style exception monitoring inside a broader observability platform with logs, traces, and infrastructure monitoring.
Migration Playbook
- Export error and event data from Sentry using the Sentry API's 'List Issues' and 'List Events' endpoints in JSON format. Map Sentry's issue fields such as 'issue_id', 'title', 'culprit', 'user', 'tags', and 'stacktrace' to Datadog's error tracking fields like 'error.message', 'error.stack', 'user.id', and 'tags'.
- Transform the exported JSON data to match Datadog's error tracking API schema, ensuring that timestamps, error levels, and context metadata are correctly formatted. Use Datadog's Logs API or Error Tracking API to import the transformed error events into the Datadog platform, targeting the appropriate application and environment identifiers.
- Verify data integrity and completeness by cross-referencing error counts and key issue attributes in Datadog's dashboard. Set up Datadog's monitoring and alerting rules to replicate Sentry's notification workflows, and configure integrations for continuous error tracking and performance monitoring within the Datadog SaaS environment.
Pros
- π’Strong unified observability platform
- π’Good correlation across errors, traces, and logs
- π’Enterprise-friendly security and governance
- π’Broad ecosystem and integrations
Cons
- π΄Can be expensive at scale
- π΄More platform than dedicated error tracker
- π΄Pricing complexity can be hard to forecast
0 builders switched
Datadog Error Tracking
Alternative to Sentry
Best for
Enterprise observability teams
Cost
Subscription pricing based on hosts, APM usage, logs, and add-ons; error tracking is typically bundled within a larger observability contract.
Summary
Commercial observability platform with application error tracking, tracing, logs, and infrastructure monitoring for teams that want a broader APM and observability suite around exception monitoring.
Why Switch
Teams switch from Sentry to Datadog Error Tracking when they want Sentry-style exception monitoring inside a broader observability platform with logs, traces, and infrastructure monitoring.
Migration Playbook
- Export error and event data from Sentry using the Sentry API's 'List Issues' and 'List Events' endpoints in JSON format. Map Sentry's issue fields such as 'issue_id', 'title', 'culprit', 'user', 'tags', and 'stacktrace' to Datadog's error tracking fields like 'error.message', 'error.stack', 'user.id', and 'tags'.
- Transform the exported JSON data to match Datadog's error tracking API schema, ensuring that timestamps, error levels, and context metadata are correctly formatted. Use Datadog's Logs API or Error Tracking API to import the transformed error events into the Datadog platform, targeting the appropriate application and environment identifiers.
- Verify data integrity and completeness by cross-referencing error counts and key issue attributes in Datadog's dashboard. Set up Datadog's monitoring and alerting rules to replicate Sentry's notification workflows, and configure integrations for continuous error tracking and performance monitoring within the Datadog SaaS environment.
Pros
- π’Strong unified observability platform
- π’Good correlation across errors, traces, and logs
- π’Enterprise-friendly security and governance
- π’Broad ecosystem and integrations
Cons
- π΄Can be expensive at scale
- π΄More platform than dedicated error tracker
- π΄Pricing complexity can be hard to forecast
0 builders switched