Dynamic Alternative Stack

Best alternatives to Supabase

Discover open-source, free tier, and premium alternatives to Supabase. Compare scores, pros/cons, and deployment paths instantly.

Swipe alternatives in Focus ModeCompare head-to-head in VS Mode
F

Firebase

Alternative to Supabase

Free TierProfessionalCloud-Native / SaaSProprietary, FreemiumPublic APIWebhooksPluginsSDK
GitHubSlackGoogleAWSStripe

Best for

Mobile and web teams needing a fast-start BaaS with Google ecosystem integration

Cost

Free tier available; usage-based pricing for Blaze pay-as-you-go with charges for database, storage, functions, and network usage.

Summary

Google's backend-as-a-service platform for mobile and web apps, offering authentication, real-time databases, cloud functions, file storage, analytics, and hosting as an integrated alternative to Supabase.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Firebase when they want a more mature, Google-backed backend platform with strong mobile tooling, integrated analytics, and a broad managed services ecosystem.

SOC2GDPRPCI DSS

Migration Playbook

  1. Export your Supabase PostgreSQL database schema and data using pg_dump in SQL or CSV format. Map PostgreSQL tables and columns to Firebase's Firestore document collections and fields, considering Firestore's NoSQL structure. Import the data into Firestore using the Firebase CLI or Firestore REST API by creating documents and collections accordingly.
  2. Export Supabase Authentication users via the Supabase Admin API or by querying the auth.users table, extracting user emails, hashed passwords, and metadata in JSON format. Map Supabase user fields to Firebase Authentication user properties, noting that Firebase supports importing users with hashed passwords using the Firebase Authentication Import API. Use the Firebase CLI or Admin SDK to import users into Firebase Authentication.
  3. Download files stored in Supabase Storage buckets using the Supabase Storage API or dashboard, preserving folder structures. Map storage buckets and file paths to Firebase Storage buckets and paths. Upload files to Firebase Storage using the Firebase CLI, Firebase Console, or Firebase Storage SDK, ensuring proper metadata and access rules are configured.

Pros

  • 🟢Very mature ecosystem and strong documentation
  • 🟢Excellent integration with Google Cloud and mobile app tooling
  • 🟢Fast to start for prototypes and production apps

Cons

  • 🔴Proprietary platform with vendor lock-in concerns
  • 🔴No direct Postgres-first architecture
  • 🔴Pricing can become unpredictable at scale

0 builders switched

Go to Firebase
A

Appwrite

Alternative to Supabase

HybridOpen-Source (OSS), FreemiumPublic APIWebhooksPluginsSDK
GitHubGitLabSlackDiscordGoogleAWS

Best for

Teams that want an open-source, self-hostable backend with a modern developer experience

Cost

Self-hosted open source is free; managed cloud plans are subscription-based with usage limits and paid tiers.

Summary

Open-source backend platform for web, mobile, and Flutter apps with authentication, databases, storage, serverless functions, and realtime capabilities.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Appwrite when they prefer an open-source backend they can self-host while keeping authentication, storage, functions, and realtime features in one platform.

Migration Playbook

  1. Export your Supabase PostgreSQL database schema and data using pg_dump in SQL or CSV format. Map Supabase tables and columns to Appwrite's database collections and attributes, ensuring data types align. Import the SQL or CSV data into Appwrite's database using the Appwrite Console or Appwrite Database API to recreate collections and populate documents.
  2. Export Supabase authentication users and metadata via the Supabase Auth API or by querying the auth.users table. Map user fields such as email, password hashes, and metadata to Appwrite's user model fields. Import users into Appwrite using the Appwrite Users API, ensuring password security by either migrating hashed passwords if compatible or prompting users to reset passwords.
  3. Export files stored in Supabase Storage buckets by downloading them via the Supabase Storage API or dashboard. Map bucket names and file paths to Appwrite Storage buckets and file structures. Upload the files to Appwrite Storage using the Appwrite Storage API or Console, preserving metadata like file names, types, and permissions.

Pros

  • 🟢Open-source and self-hostable
  • 🟢Strong developer experience with SDKs and dashboards
  • 🟢Broad feature set similar to modern BaaS platforms

Cons

  • 🔴Smaller ecosystem than Firebase or Supabase
  • 🔴Operational overhead if self-hosted
  • 🔴Some advanced features require managed plans or extra setup

0 builders switched

Go to Appwrite
A

AWS Amplify

Alternative to Supabase

Free TierEnterpriseCloud-Native / SaaSProprietaryPublic APIWebhooksPluginsSDK
GitHubGitLabSlackJiraGoogleAWS

Best for

AWS-standardized teams building full-stack web and mobile apps

Cost

Pay-as-you-go pricing with a free tier for some usage; costs scale with build minutes, storage, bandwidth, and backend services consumed.

Summary

AWS-managed platform for building and deploying full-stack web and mobile applications with hosting, authentication, APIs, and backend integration.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to AWS Amplify when they need tighter integration with AWS services, enterprise controls, and a broader cloud platform for production workloads.

SOC2GDPRISO 27001

Migration Playbook

  1. Export your Supabase PostgreSQL database using pg_dump in a compatible format (e.g., plain SQL or custom format). Map your database schema, tables, and data types to AWS RDS PostgreSQL or Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL. Import the dump into the target AWS RDS/Aurora instance using the psql command-line tool or AWS Database Migration Service for minimal downtime.
  2. For authentication migration, export your Supabase Auth user data including user IDs, emails, hashed passwords, and metadata via Supabase API or direct database queries. Map these fields to AWS Cognito user pool attributes, ensuring password hashes are compatible or require password resets. Import users into AWS Cognito using the AWS CLI or Cognito Identity Provider API with the AdminCreateUser or ImportUsers feature.
  3. Migrate Supabase Storage files by exporting them via the Supabase Storage API or directly from the underlying storage bucket. Map file paths and metadata to Amazon S3 bucket structure. Import files into S3 using AWS CLI (aws s3 sync) or SDKs, and update your application configuration to point to the new S3 endpoints and use AWS Amplify Storage APIs for file access.

Pros

  • 🟢Deep integration with AWS services and enterprise security controls
  • 🟢Supports full-stack apps beyond frontend hosting
  • 🟢Scales well for organizations already standardized on AWS

Cons

  • 🔴More complex setup and operations than Vercel
  • 🔴Developer experience can feel less streamlined for simple frontend deployments
  • 🔴Pricing and service interactions can be harder to predict

0 builders switched

Go to AWS Amplify
H

Hasura

Alternative to Supabase

Cloud-Native / SaaS, HybridOpen-Source (OSS), ProprietaryOpen CorePublic APIWebhooksPluginsSDK
GitHubGitLabSlackJiraGoogleAWS

Best for

Data-centric teams building APIs on top of existing databases, especially Postgres

Cost

Open-source core available; cloud and enterprise offerings are subscription-based with pricing tied to usage and deployment needs.

Summary

Enterprise-grade data API platform that turns databases into GraphQL and REST APIs, with permissions, eventing, and federation for building backend services around Postgres and other sources.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Hasura when they need instant GraphQL and REST APIs with enterprise-grade permissions and eventing around existing data sources rather than a full all-in-one backend.

SOC2GDPR

Migration Playbook

  1. Export your Supabase PostgreSQL database schema and data using pg_dump in the custom format (pg_dump -Fc). Review and map Supabase-specific extensions and custom types to ensure compatibility with Hasura's supported Postgres features.
  2. Set up Hasura by connecting it to your existing PostgreSQL database instance. Use Hasura's console or CLI to introspect the database schema, automatically generating GraphQL APIs. Map Supabase auth roles and policies to Hasura's permission system by defining role-based access controls in Hasura's permissions tab.
  3. Migrate Supabase edge functions and realtime subscriptions by rewriting them as Hasura event triggers and actions. Export Supabase realtime configurations and recreate equivalent event triggers in Hasura using its eventing API, ensuring that business logic is implemented via Hasura Actions or serverless functions integrated with Hasura.

Pros

  • 🟢Strong for instant APIs over existing databases
  • 🟢Powerful authorization and event-driven workflows
  • 🟢Suitable for enterprise governance and scaling

Cons

  • 🔴Not a full Supabase-style all-in-one backend
  • 🔴GraphQL-centric approach may not fit every team
  • 🔴Can require more architecture work than simpler BaaS tools

0 builders switched

Go to Hasura
N

Nhost

Alternative to Supabase

Cloud-Native / SaaS, HybridOpen-Source (OSS), FreemiumPublic APIWebhooksPluginsSDK
GitHubSlackGoogleAWS

Best for

Postgres-first teams that want a managed backend with open-source roots

Cost

Free tier available; paid cloud plans and enterprise options are subscription-based, with self-hosting possible for some components.

Summary

Postgres-based backend platform with authentication, storage, serverless functions, and GraphQL APIs, positioned as a close alternative for teams wanting a managed backend with open-source roots.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Nhost when they want a similar Postgres-centric backend experience with auth, storage, and functions, but prefer its GraphQL-oriented workflow or open-source deployment options.

SOC2GDPR

Migration Playbook

  1. Export your Supabase PostgreSQL database schema and data using pg_dump in a custom or plain SQL format. Map Supabase-specific extensions or functions to their Nhost-compatible equivalents, ensuring all tables, indexes, and constraints are preserved. Import the resulting SQL dump into the Nhost PostgreSQL instance via psql or Nhost's database import API.
  2. Extract authentication users and metadata from Supabase Auth by exporting the auth.users table and related metadata tables in CSV or JSON format. Map Supabase user fields (e.g., email, hashed_password, user_metadata) to Nhost Auth schema fields, then import users using Nhost's Admin API or GraphQL mutations to recreate user accounts and roles securely.
  3. For storage migration, list all files stored in Supabase Storage buckets using the Supabase Storage API and download them locally or stream them. Re-upload these files to corresponding buckets in Nhost Storage using Nhost's Storage API, maintaining folder structure and metadata such as content-type and access permissions to ensure seamless file access post-migration.

Pros

  • 🟢Postgres-centric and developer-friendly
  • 🟢Includes auth, storage, and functions in one platform
  • 🟢Open-source components reduce lock-in concerns

Cons

  • 🔴Smaller market presence than Supabase
  • 🔴GraphQL-first workflow may not suit all teams
  • 🔴Managed offerings and docs are less extensive than larger competitors

0 builders switched

Go to Nhost

Community FAQ

Questions by product

Supabase FAQ

How complex is it to self-host Supabase for production use?

Self-hosting Supabase involves deploying multiple components including Postgres, the realtime server, auth services, storage, and edge functions. While the core is open-source, production hardening requires configuring backups, scaling, and security measures manually. The official Supabase GitHub repo provides docker-compose setups, but operational overhead is significant compared to managed hosting. Expect to invest in monitoring and maintenance infrastructure.

Community insight informed by Reddit discussions

Does Supabase support offline functionality or local-first data sync?

Supabase does not natively support offline-first or local data sync out of the box. Its realtime features rely on active WebSocket connections to sync data changes. For offline scenarios, developers need to implement client-side caching and conflict resolution manually or integrate with third-party libraries. This makes offline-first app development more complex compared to platforms designed specifically for local sync.

Community insight informed by Hacker News discussions

Who owns the data when using Supabase hosted services? Is there vendor lock-in?

Data stored in Supabase's hosted services remains fully owned by the user, as it is stored in PostgreSQL databases you control. Supabase is open-source, and you can export your data at any time. However, using hosted services means trusting Supabase infrastructure until you migrate or self-host. To avoid vendor lock-in, you can self-host or export your database and storage assets regularly.

Community insight informed by StackOverflow discussions

What are the API limitations when using Supabase's realtime and edge functions?

Supabase realtime APIs support subscriptions to Postgres changes but have limitations on complex query types and large-scale fanouts. Edge functions run in a serverless environment with execution time and resource constraints, which may not suit heavy compute tasks. Additionally, some advanced Postgres features or extensions might not be fully supported in realtime streams or edge functions.

Community insight informed by Forums discussions

How easy is it to migrate existing Postgres databases to Supabase?

Migrating an existing Postgres database to Supabase is straightforward since Supabase uses standard Postgres under the hood. You can dump your current database schema and data and restore it into Supabase. However, you may need to adapt authentication and storage integrations to Supabase's APIs. Also, Supabase-specific features like realtime or edge functions require additional setup post-migration.

Community insight informed by Reddit discussions

Firebase FAQ

Is it possible to self-host Firebase or its core services to avoid vendor lock-in?

Firebase is a proprietary platform tightly integrated with Google Cloud services and does not offer an official self-hosted version. While some open-source alternatives like Supabase exist, Firebase itself cannot be self-hosted, so vendor lock-in is a significant consideration.

Community insight informed by Reddit discussions

How does Firebase handle offline functionality for real-time databases on mobile apps?

Firebase Realtime Database and Firestore SDKs provide built-in offline support by caching data locally on the device. Changes made offline are synchronized automatically when connectivity is restored, enabling seamless offline-first experiences without additional backend setup.

Community insight informed by StackOverflow discussions

What are the main limitations of Firebase APIs when building complex querying or relational data models?

Firebase Realtime Database and Firestore have limited querying capabilities compared to traditional SQL databases. Complex joins, multi-field queries, and aggregations are not natively supported, requiring data denormalization or additional backend logic via Cloud Functions for advanced use cases.

Community insight informed by Hacker News discussions

What options exist for exporting or migrating data out of Firebase to avoid lock-in?

Firebase allows exporting data from Firestore and Realtime Database via Google Cloud Storage exports or REST APIs. However, migrations often require custom scripts to transform data into formats compatible with other databases since Firebase uses a NoSQL JSON-like structure.

Community insight informed by Forums discussions

Appwrite FAQ

What are the main challenges when self-hosting Appwrite compared to using managed services?

Self-hosting Appwrite requires managing the entire infrastructure stack including Docker containers, database setup (MariaDB), and SSL configurations. You need to handle backups, scaling, and updates manually, which introduces operational overhead. Unlike managed plans, you won't get automatic scaling or uptime guarantees, so monitoring and maintenance are your responsibility.

Community insight informed by Reddit discussions

Does Appwrite support offline-first or offline data synchronization for mobile apps?

Appwrite does not provide built-in offline-first capabilities or automatic offline data synchronization. While the SDKs support realtime updates when online, you must implement your own local caching and conflict resolution strategies on the client side to handle offline scenarios.

Community insight informed by Hacker News discussions

How does Appwrite ensure full data ownership and privacy when self-hosted?

Since Appwrite is fully open-source and self-hostable, all data remains within your infrastructure. You control the database, storage, and backups, ensuring no third-party has access to your users' data. This setup aligns with strict privacy requirements and compliance needs, unlike proprietary BaaS platforms.

Community insight informed by StackOverflow discussions

Are there any API rate limits or usage restrictions when running Appwrite on-premises?

When self-hosting Appwrite, there are no enforced API rate limits by default; limits depend on your infrastructure capacity. However, managed Appwrite cloud plans may impose rate limits to ensure fair usage. You can implement custom rate limiting proxies or middleware if needed for your self-hosted deployment.

Community insight informed by Forums discussions

What are the recommended migration or export options if we want to move data out of Appwrite?

Appwrite allows exporting your database data via direct database dumps (MariaDB exports) and storage files through standard file system access. There is no built-in one-click migration tool, so you need to handle data transformation and re-import on the target platform manually. The open-source nature facilitates custom scripts for migration.

Community insight informed by Reddit discussions

AWS Amplify FAQ

Can AWS Amplify be self-hosted or run entirely offline for development?

AWS Amplify is a fully managed cloud service and does not support self-hosting or running completely offline. While you can develop frontend code locally, backend resources like authentication, APIs, and hosting require AWS cloud services. Offline development is limited to local frontend simulation without backend functionality.

Community insight informed by Reddit discussions

How does AWS Amplify handle data ownership and control over backend resources?

Data ownership in AWS Amplify depends on the AWS account used to provision backend resources. Since Amplify provisions resources like Cognito, AppSync, and DynamoDB within your AWS account, you retain full ownership and control of your data. However, data is stored in AWS-managed services, so compliance with AWS policies applies.

Community insight informed by Hacker News discussions

Are there any API limitations or throttling concerns when using AWS Amplify's GraphQL or REST APIs?

AWS Amplify itself does not impose additional API limits beyond those of underlying AWS services like AppSync (GraphQL) or API Gateway (REST). These services have documented throttling and quota limits, which you must monitor and manage. Amplify CLI and libraries do not add rate limiting but you should architect for scaling accordingly.

Community insight informed by StackOverflow discussions

What are the recommended migration or export options if we want to move away from AWS Amplify?

Since AWS Amplify tightly integrates with AWS backend services, migration involves exporting your backend infrastructure configurations (e.g., CloudFormation templates) and frontend code separately. You can export Amplify backend as CloudFormation stacks, but migrating to a non-AWS platform requires re-implementing backend services. There is no one-click export for full app migration.

Community insight informed by Forums discussions

Hasura FAQ

How complex is it to self-host Hasura for enterprise use, and what infrastructure components are required?

Self-hosting Hasura involves deploying the Hasura GraphQL engine, typically as a Docker container or Kubernetes pod, alongside your Postgres database. You need to manage the database, Hasura service, and optionally a metadata storage (usually within the same Postgres instance). Infrastructure-wise, it requires a reliable environment with persistent storage, network access to the database, and environment variables for configuration. While Hasura provides official Docker images and Helm charts, setting up high availability, backups, and scaling requires additional DevOps effort compared to managed services.

Community insight informed by Reddit discussions

Does Hasura support offline-first functionality or local caching for GraphQL queries?

Hasura itself does not provide built-in offline-first capabilities or local caching layers. It focuses on instant real-time GraphQL APIs over your database. Offline functionality must be implemented at the client level using tools like Apollo Client with cache persistence or other GraphQL clients that support offline caching and synchronization. Hasura can support real-time subscriptions which help keep clients updated when online, but offline sync logic is outside its scope.

Community insight informed by Hacker News discussions

How does Hasura handle data ownership and privacy when connecting to multiple data sources?

Hasura connects directly to your databases and data sources, so data ownership remains fully with you. It does not store or proxy data outside your infrastructure unless you explicitly configure remote schemas or event triggers that send data elsewhere. Permissions and role-based access control are enforced at the GraphQL engine level, allowing fine-grained control over who can access or mutate data. This design ensures that data privacy and ownership are maintained within your environment.

Community insight informed by StackOverflow discussions

What are the main API limitations of Hasura compared to a full backend-as-a-service like Supabase?

Hasura specializes in instant GraphQL APIs over existing Postgres databases and offers powerful event triggers and permissions. However, it does not provide built-in user authentication, file storage, or serverless functions out-of-the-box like Supabase. You need to integrate external auth providers and additional backend services yourself. Also, Hasura's GraphQL-centric approach means REST API support is secondary and may require extra configuration. Thus, teams looking for an all-in-one backend solution might find Hasura requires more architectural work.

Community insight informed by Reddit discussions

What migration or export paths exist if we want to move away from Hasura in the future?

Since Hasura primarily generates GraphQL APIs on top of your existing Postgres database, your data remains in your control within the database. Migrating away involves exporting your database schema and data using standard Postgres tools like pg_dump. Hasura metadata (permissions, relationships, event triggers) can be exported as YAML or JSON files via Hasura CLI, which can be version-controlled. However, these metadata configurations are Hasura-specific and won’t directly translate to other platforms, so rebuilding API logic will be necessary if you switch.

Community insight informed by Forums discussions

Nhost FAQ

How complex is it to self-host Nhost compared to using their managed service?

Self-hosting Nhost requires deploying multiple components including Postgres, Hasura GraphQL engine, authentication, storage, and serverless functions. While all core components are open-source, setting up and maintaining the full stack demands familiarity with Docker and Kubernetes or similar orchestration tools. The managed service abstracts this complexity, so self-hosting is recommended only if you have DevOps resources and want full control over infrastructure.

Community insight informed by Reddit discussions

Does Nhost support offline functionality or local development workflows?

Nhost supports local development via its CLI tool, which can spin up a local environment with Postgres, Hasura, and authentication emulators. However, offline support for client apps depends on your implementation since Nhost itself is a backend platform. There is no built-in offline sync layer, so you need to handle caching and sync logic on the client side.

Community insight informed by Hacker News discussions

Who owns the data stored in Nhost, and how is data privacy handled?

Data stored in Nhost is fully owned by the user or organization deploying the backend. When using the managed service, data resides in the cloud infrastructure controlled by Nhost, but you retain full ownership and can export your data anytime. The platform uses open-source components, so you can self-host to have complete control over data privacy and compliance.

Community insight informed by StackOverflow discussions

Are there any limitations on the GraphQL API provided by Nhost compared to vanilla Hasura?

Nhost builds on Hasura's GraphQL engine but adds authentication and storage layers. While most Hasura features are available, some advanced Hasura customizations or plugins may not be supported out-of-the-box in Nhost's managed environment. Self-hosting lets you extend Hasura as needed, but the managed service prioritizes stability and security over full Hasura extensibility.

Community insight informed by Forums discussions

What are the recommended migration or export paths if we want to move away from Nhost?

Since Nhost uses standard Postgres and Hasura, you can export your database using typical Postgres dump tools (pg_dump) and export Hasura metadata via Hasura CLI. For authentication and storage data, you need to export user data and files separately using provided APIs or direct database access. This open-source foundation makes migration feasible, but some manual work is required to fully replicate serverless functions and auth configurations.

Community insight informed by Reddit discussions

Explore more

Related Open Source tools

Other catalog hubs tagged with Open Source.