Best Vetted Alternatives to Supabase

F

Firebase

Alternative to Supabase

SecurityB

7.4/10

Rep Score: 920 Saves

SubscriptionProfessionalCloud-Native / SaaSProprietary, Freemium

Plays nice with

GitHubSlackGoogleAWSStripe

Best forMobile and web teams needing a fast-start BaaS with Google ecosystem integration

Free tier available; usage-based pricing for Blaze pay-as-you-go with charges for database, storage, functions, and network usage.

Summary

Google's backend-as-a-service platform for mobile and web apps, offering authentication, real-time databases, cloud functions, file storage, analytics, and hosting as an integrated alternative to Supabase.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Firebase when they want a more mature, Google-backed backend platform with strong mobile tooling, integrated analytics, and a broad managed services ecosystem.

Pros

Cons

0 builders switched

Go to Firebase

F

Firebase

Alternative to Supabase

SecurityB

7.4/10

Rep Score: 920 Saves

SubscriptionProfessionalCloud-Native / SaaSProprietary, Freemium

Plays nice with

GitHubSlackGoogleAWSStripe

Best for

Mobile and web teams needing a fast-start BaaS with Google ecosystem integration

Cost

Free tier available; usage-based pricing for Blaze pay-as-you-go with charges for database, storage, functions, and network usage.

Summary

Google's backend-as-a-service platform for mobile and web apps, offering authentication, real-time databases, cloud functions, file storage, analytics, and hosting as an integrated alternative to Supabase.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Firebase when they want a more mature, Google-backed backend platform with strong mobile tooling, integrated analytics, and a broad managed services ecosystem.

Pros

Cons

0 builders switched

Go to Firebase

AA

AWS Amplify

Alternative to Supabase

SecurityB

8.6/10

Rep Score: 880 Saves

Free TierEnterpriseCloud-Native / SaaSProprietary, Freemium

Plays nice with

GitHubGitLabSlackJiraGoogleAWS

Best forAWS-native product teams building full-stack web and mobile apps at scale

Has a free tier for some services; pricing is usage-based across AWS resources and can scale with consumption.

Summary

Amazon's application development platform for building full-stack web and mobile apps, combining authentication, APIs, storage, hosting, and backend integrations with AWS services.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to AWS Amplify when they need tighter integration with AWS services, enterprise controls, and a broader cloud platform for production workloads.

Pros

🟢Deep integration with AWS ecosystem and enterprise controls
🟢Scales well for production workloads

Cons

🔴More complex than Supabase for simple projects
🔴AWS pricing and service interactions can be hard to reason about

0 builders switched

Go to AWS Amplify

AA

AWS Amplify

Alternative to Supabase

SecurityB

8.6/10

Rep Score: 880 Saves

Free TierEnterpriseCloud-Native / SaaSProprietary, Freemium

Plays nice with

GitHubGitLabSlackJiraGoogleAWS

Best for

AWS-native product teams building full-stack web and mobile apps at scale

Cost

Has a free tier for some services; pricing is usage-based across AWS resources and can scale with consumption.

Summary

Amazon's application development platform for building full-stack web and mobile apps, combining authentication, APIs, storage, hosting, and backend integrations with AWS services.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to AWS Amplify when they need tighter integration with AWS services, enterprise controls, and a broader cloud platform for production workloads.

Pros

🟢Deep integration with AWS ecosystem and enterprise controls
🟢Scales well for production workloads
🟢Broad service coverage for full-stack app development

Cons

🔴More complex than Supabase for simple projects
🔴AWS pricing and service interactions can be hard to reason about
🔴Less opinionated and developer-friendly out of the box

0 builders switched

Go to AWS Amplify

A

Appwrite

Alternative to Supabase

SecurityB

8.4/10

Rep Score: 840 Saves

Cloud-Native / SaaS, Self-HostedOpen-Source (MIT), Freemium

Plays nice with

GitHubGitLabSlackDiscordGoogleAWS

Best forTeams wanting a self-hostable Firebase-style backend

Open-source and self-hostable; managed cloud offerings and enterprise options are typically priced by usage or deployment size.

Summary

Open-source backend platform for web, mobile, and Flutter apps, providing authentication, databases, storage, functions, and messaging as a Firebase-style alternative.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Appwrite when they prefer an open-source backend they can self-host while keeping authentication, storage, functions, and realtime features in one platform.

Pros

🟢Open-source and self-hostable
🟢Good Firebase-style feature coverage for app backends

Cons

🔴Smaller ecosystem than Firebase
🔴Managed service and enterprise tooling are less mature than top-tier cloud vendors

0 builders switched

Go to Appwrite

A

Appwrite

Alternative to Supabase

SecurityB

8.4/10

Rep Score: 840 Saves

Cloud-Native / SaaS, Self-HostedOpen-Source (MIT), Freemium

Plays nice with

GitHubGitLabSlackDiscordGoogleAWS

Best for

Teams wanting a self-hostable Firebase-style backend

Cost

Open-source and self-hostable; managed cloud offerings and enterprise options are typically priced by usage or deployment size.

Summary

Open-source backend platform for web, mobile, and Flutter apps, providing authentication, databases, storage, functions, and messaging as a Firebase-style alternative.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Appwrite when they prefer an open-source backend they can self-host while keeping authentication, storage, functions, and realtime features in one platform.

Pros

🟢Open-source and self-hostable
🟢Good Firebase-style feature coverage for app backends
🟢Strong support for modern app frameworks
🟢Flexible for teams wanting more control over infrastructure

Cons

🔴Smaller ecosystem than Firebase
🔴Managed service and enterprise tooling are less mature than top-tier cloud vendors
🔴Some advanced workflows may require more manual setup

0 builders switched

Go to Appwrite

H

Hasura

Alternative to Supabase

SecurityB

8/10

Rep Score: 810 Saves

Cloud-Native / SaaS, HybridOpen-Source (OSS), Proprietary

Plays nice with

GitHubGitLabSlackJiraGoogleAWS

Best forData-centric teams building APIs on top of existing databases, especially Postgres

Open-source core available; cloud and enterprise offerings are subscription-based with pricing tied to usage and deployment needs.

Summary

Enterprise-grade data API platform that turns databases into GraphQL and REST APIs, with permissions, eventing, and federation for building backend services around Postgres and other sources.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Hasura when they need instant GraphQL and REST APIs with enterprise-grade permissions and eventing around existing data sources rather than a full all-in-one backend.

Pros

🟢Strong for instant APIs over existing databases
🟢Powerful authorization and event-driven workflows

Cons

🔴Not a full Supabase-style all-in-one backend
🔴GraphQL-centric approach may not fit every team

0 builders switched

Go to Hasura

H

Hasura

Alternative to Supabase

SecurityB

8/10

Rep Score: 810 Saves

Cloud-Native / SaaS, HybridOpen-Source (OSS), Proprietary

Plays nice with

GitHubGitLabSlackJiraGoogleAWS

Best for

Data-centric teams building APIs on top of existing databases, especially Postgres

Cost

Open-source core available; cloud and enterprise offerings are subscription-based with pricing tied to usage and deployment needs.

Summary

Enterprise-grade data API platform that turns databases into GraphQL and REST APIs, with permissions, eventing, and federation for building backend services around Postgres and other sources.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Hasura when they need instant GraphQL and REST APIs with enterprise-grade permissions and eventing around existing data sources rather than a full all-in-one backend.

Pros

🟢Strong for instant APIs over existing databases
🟢Powerful authorization and event-driven workflows
🟢Suitable for enterprise governance and scaling

Cons

🔴Not a full Supabase-style all-in-one backend
🔴GraphQL-centric approach may not fit every team
🔴Can require more architecture work than simpler BaaS tools

0 builders switched

Go to Hasura

N

Nhost

Alternative to Supabase

SecurityB

7.9/10

Rep Score: 760 Saves

Cloud-Native / SaaS, HybridOpen-Source (OSS), Freemium

Plays nice with

GitHubSlackGoogleAWS

Best forPostgres-first teams that want a managed backend with open-source roots

Free tier available; paid cloud plans and enterprise options are subscription-based, with self-hosting possible for some components.

Summary

Postgres-based backend platform with authentication, storage, serverless functions, and GraphQL APIs, positioned as a close alternative for teams wanting a managed backend with open-source roots.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Nhost when they want a similar Postgres-centric backend experience with auth, storage, and functions, but prefer its GraphQL-oriented workflow or open-source deployment options.

Pros

🟢Postgres-centric and developer-friendly
🟢Includes auth, storage, and functions in one platform

Cons

🔴Smaller market presence than Supabase
🔴GraphQL-first workflow may not suit all teams

0 builders switched

Go to Nhost

N

Nhost

Alternative to Supabase

SecurityB

7.9/10

Rep Score: 760 Saves

Cloud-Native / SaaS, HybridOpen-Source (OSS), Freemium

Plays nice with

GitHubSlackGoogleAWS

Best for

Postgres-first teams that want a managed backend with open-source roots

Cost

Free tier available; paid cloud plans and enterprise options are subscription-based, with self-hosting possible for some components.

Summary

Postgres-based backend platform with authentication, storage, serverless functions, and GraphQL APIs, positioned as a close alternative for teams wanting a managed backend with open-source roots.

Why Switch

Teams switch from Supabase to Nhost when they want a similar Postgres-centric backend experience with auth, storage, and functions, but prefer its GraphQL-oriented workflow or open-source deployment options.

Pros

🟢Postgres-centric and developer-friendly
🟢Includes auth, storage, and functions in one platform
🟢Open-source components reduce lock-in concerns

Cons

🔴Smaller market presence than Supabase
🔴GraphQL-first workflow may not suit all teams
🔴Managed offerings and docs are less extensive than larger competitors

0 builders switched

Go to Nhost